Share the video, then. Someone has to have saved it and reported it if it was that bad, right?

I haven't seen it because by the time I woke up, there were too many death threats from right-wing terrorists and it was taken down to protect their patients and doctors.

Let go of your fantasies and come to the real world... The video was taken down because the "expert" child abusers did not have any self awareness of what they are doing - to 2 year olds. Stop making excuses.

Below is my quoted post that you apparently ignored - note a twitter link to the video at the bottom where you can view it.

Note what it took for you to admit you did not know what you are talking about (did not see the video) and yet you still make excuses and blame a group of people who are concerned about the abuse of 2 year olds. Think about that? Let go of your programming and see the world as it is rather than through leftists' talking points. Start using that brain of yours to form your own opinions based on your own research.

*sigh*

Please stop sending death threats to doctors because your only exposure to LGBT people is through the lens of sex stuff.

That looks an awful lot like you are accusing another member here of doing something, and I'm absolutely sure you don't have the evidence to back up such an allegation, not to mention it's an actionable allegation unless you do have that evidence. Careful with your words Amadaun . . . your disdain for those who don't see the world through your lens doesn't allow you to defame them.

"Identity Fixation" or in other words, "How the Woke are Egocentric 2 Year Olds"

That looks an awful lot like you are accusing another member here of doing something, and I'm absolutely sure you don't have the evidence to back up such an allegation, not to mention it's an actionable allegation unless you do have that evidence. Careful with your words. Your disdain for those who don't see the world through your lens doesn't allow you to defame them.

Come on. At least be honest.

One of these things is not like the other. One is an opinion, one is an accusation. If the former said something along the lines of "I wish people would stop sending threats to doctors because their only exposure to LGBT people is through the lens of sex stuff.", it, too, would be an opinion and not an accusation.

Again, Amadaun, you need to be careful with your words. The quote of your words above would be an actionable event if the person to whom it was directed chose to do so. Your response is a directed response which accuses another member of sending death threats to doctors. Unless you can actually prove that the person to whom you were responding did, in fact, send death threats to doctors, your post is libelous.

No. It isn't. It's not defamatory because neither of us said anything about other peoples' real-life names that could harm their reputations and livelihood. And I doubt either of us have a huge presence online. So no harm there, either.

Please read up on stuff, Norman Pattis of Pinecam.

That you don't know the individual you are libeling does not release you from the liability for libeling them.

There are many on this board who know the individuals behind the nics, have met them and interacted with them at various functions associated with the community on the BB. Bailey Days, TAC, IMHS, other charity activities, gatherings for breakfast or lunch . . . there's a reason a lot of people know the actual names of individuals like cosmiccowboy55, Lo-Bay Lady, ColoradoSunshine, aspenleaf, JMiller, Wliey Fox aka Angela, Stecat, and so many others, including myself, who have a presence on this site.

I'm sure you'll have an opportunity to test your theory if your present habits persist and then we'll find out which of us is correct. A better choice would be to self-moderate your emotional outbursts before clicking on the "Submit" button . . .

Stop. Cosmic Cowboy just died and you're using his name for an online argument?

People on Pinecam are grieving. Shut up until you develop a shred of empathy.

Oh please Amadaun . . . your faux outrage is as empty as most of your arguments usually are. I worked side by side with Ed many times, he would approve of the dressing down you received with my post and his inclusion in it. But that's the point, isn't it . . . those you are libeling are known to us if not to you.

As I said, continue on your current libelous path and I'm certain you'll have the opportunity to test your theory.